Notice under Section 147 – Income Escaping Assessment

Call Us Today +91 80000 57972

The Finance Act of 2021 brought a complete overhaul to the reassessment and assessment provisions under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act (ITA). To fully grasp this section, it’s important to first understand what assessment and escaped assessment mean. Every individual whose income is taxable is obligated to file an income tax return (ITR) with the Income Tax Department. Upon receiving the return, the tax authorities may review it and request clarifications if needed. This review process is what we refer to as an assessment.

Notice under Section 147 – Income Escaping Assessment
KM Gatecha and Co LLP Chartered Accountants

Phone No - +91 80000 57972

Mail us at - [email protected]



    Notice under Section 147 – Income Escaping Assessment

    Different Types of Assessment

    There are several categories of income tax assessments:

    • Self-assessment

    • Preliminary assessment

    • Regular assessment

    • Special assessment

    Under self-assessment, taxpayers themselves calculate their income and tax liability for a given financial year, and this is reported in the next year, called the assessment year.

    For example, income earned during FY 2023–24 is assessed in AY 2024–25. After determining their tax due, taxpayers must pay the amount and file their ITR accordingly.

    Next, the Income Tax Department performs a preliminary check using an automated system to identify calculation errors or invalid claims. This is a basic review, not a detailed evaluation.

    Notice under Section 147 – Income Escaping Assessment

    Regular assessments include more detailed checks and fall under:

    • Scrutiny assessment (Section 143(3))

    • Best judgement assessment (Section 144)

    Special assessments cover:

    • Income escaping assessment (Section 147)

    • Assessments following a search (Sections 153A to 153C)


    Notice under Section 147 – Income Escaping Assessment

    What Happens When Income Escapes Assessment?

    In some cases, certain portions of a taxpayer’s income may not be evaluated during the initial assessment—either due to oversight or intentional misreporting. When an Assessing Officer (AO) believes that any income chargeable to tax has not been accounted for, they can reopen the case for reassessment under Section 147.

    This allows the AO to:

    • Assess or reassess the unaccounted income,

    • Recalculate losses, depreciation, or deductions for that particular assessment year.

    This reassessment follows the procedures outlined in Sections 148 to 153 and can be carried out more than once, provided all the necessary conditions under Section 147 are fulfilled.


    Examples of Income Escaping Assessment

    • If someone earns ₹24 lakh in AY 2024–25 but only reports ₹20 lakh, the unreported ₹4 lakh is considered to have escaped assessment.

    • In another case, if a business owner earns ₹40 lakh in a year but does not file a return at all, the entire amount is treated as escaped income.


    Authority of the Assessing Officer

    The Income Tax Act empowers the AO to re-evaluate any income that appears to have escaped taxation under Sections 147 and 148. While these provisions are designed to ensure that every taxpayer pays their fair share, they have often led to legal disputes due to interpretational issues.

    To address such complexities, the Finance Act, 2021 and the proposed changes in the Finance Bill, 2022 aim to streamline the process and make it more transparent and efficient.

    Amendments Introduced by the Finance Act, 2021

    The Finance Act, 2021 brought significant structural changes to the reassessment framework under the Income-tax Act. It replaced the earlier Sections 147 to 149 with the newly formulated Sections 147, 148, 148A, and 149. Additionally, the previously existing Sections 153A to 153C were removed and their provisions consolidated under the new Section 147.


    Introduction of Section 148A: Mandatory Preliminary Inquiry

    One of the key changes includes the insertion of Section 148A, which makes it mandatory for the Assessing Officer (AO) to first carry out an inquiry and give the taxpayer an opportunity to be heard before issuing any reassessment notice.

    Only after evaluating the taxpayer’s response and considering all relevant material, can the AO decide whether it is appropriate to proceed with the reassessment under Section 147.


    From “Reason to Believe” to “Information-Based” Action

    Earlier, reassessment proceedings could be initiated if the AO had “reason to believe” that income had escaped assessment. The AO could then, under Sections 148 to 153, assess such income or any other income that came to notice during the course of reassessment.

    However, with the amendments, the process has shifted from being subjective to data-driven. The AO must now rely on specific information to reopen assessments—thereby eliminating personal discretion and increasing transparency.


    What Qualifies as Information Suggesting Escaped Income?

    For actions under Sections 147 and 148, the AO must possess credible information indicating that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. This includes:

    • Flagged Information: Any detail flagged for a specific assessment year under the risk management strategy formulated by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT).

    • Audit Objections: Any final objection raised by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) suggesting that the original assessment did not comply with the provisions of the Act.

    • Presumed Information: Certain conditions automatically deem the AO to have information of escaped income:

      • Search Cases: If a search under Section 132 is conducted, or assets, books, or documents are requisitioned under Section 132A, on or after April 1, 2021.

      • Survey Cases: If a survey is carried out under Section 133A, except for subsections (2A) and (5), after the same date.

      • Asset Seizure Cases: If the AO, with prior approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), concludes that any money, bullion, jewellery, or valuables seized under Section 132A belongs to the assessee.

    Finance Act 2022 Updates:

    Changes in the Time Limits for Completion of Assessment, Reassessment, and Recalculation

    The Finance Act, 2022, revised the deadlines for finalizing assessments:

    • For Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21, the time allowed to complete the assessment has been extended from 12 months to 18 months.

    • Starting from AY 2021-22, assessments must be concluded within 9 months from the end of the relevant Assessment Year.

    Revised Time Limits for Assessment Completion:

    Assessment Year

    Deadline for Completion of Assessment

    AY 2021-22 and onwards

    Within 9 months after the end of the respective Assessment Year

    AY 2020-21

    Within 18 months after the end of the respective Assessment Year

    AY 2019-20

    Within 12 months after the end of the respective Assessment Year

    AY 2018-19

    Within 18 months after the end of the respective Assessment Year

    Up to AY 2017-18

    Within 21 months after the end of the respective Assessment Year

    Additionally, any searches or requisitions initiated under Sections 132 or 132A during the financial year 2021-22 will follow the new guidelines under Section 147 and must adhere to the time limits specified in Section 153.

    Other Relevant Provisions

    Before issuing a notice under Section 148, the Assessing Officer (AO) must first comply with the requirements of Section 148A. This section mandates that the AO must provide the assessee with a chance to explain why a notice for reassessment under Section 147 should not be initiated.

    While Section 148 deals with issuing notices in cases where income has potentially escaped assessment, Section 151 governs the approval process required for such notices to be issued.

    Moreover, if during the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, the AO identifies any additional issues where income has also escaped assessment, they are permitted to assess or reassess those as well—even if the steps outlined in Section 148A were not followed specifically for those additional issues.

    FAQs

     Yes, an Assessing Officer (AO) can reopen cases beyond the three-year period under Section 147. However, this is permitted only if the AO possesses information indicating that income amounting to ₹50 lakh or more has escaped assessment for the concerned assessment year. In such cases, the AO can initiate reassessment proceedings up to ten years from the end of the relevant assessment year.

     If you do not agree with the reassessment order passed under Section 147, you have the right to challenge it. You can file an appeal with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). If still dissatisfied, you may further appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), and subsequently to higher judicial authorities, including the High Court and Supreme Court.

     Section 147 grants the Income Tax Officer (ITO) the authority to reassess an assessee’s income if there is reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has not been assessed previously. This section allows the AO to include such unassessed income with the income already disclosed in the original return.

     If you discover an error or omission in your filed income tax return and wish to prevent the possibility of reassessment under Section 147, you should promptly file a revised return. Doing so can help rectify the mistake and demonstrate voluntary compliance.

    • Up to 3 years from the end of the relevant assessment year if the escaped income is below ₹50 lakh.

    • Up to 10 years if the escaped income is ₹50 lakh or more.

     No, the AO must have valid information or reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. Mere suspicion is not sufficient. For any queries, contact KMG CO LLP!

     Once a notice under Section 148 is issued, the assessee must respond, and the AO may conduct further inquiry and pass a reassessment order.

     No, once a reassessment notice is issued, a revised return cannot be filed voluntarily. It’s advisable to correct mistakes before any notice is served.

     Yes, non-compliance with reassessment notices may result in a best judgment assessment and potential penalties.